The Important Role of Rearrangements, Duplications, and Deletions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 – Part 2

(This is the second part of a series that began with a previous post – “The Important Role of Rearrangements, Duplications, and Deletions of BRCA1 and BRCA2“.)

In Part 1 of this series, we provided an introduction to the role that large rearrangements of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes play in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer risk.

A newly published research paper has provided a wealth of information about the relative frequency and impact that large rearrangements have on Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer risk in a relatively genetically diverse population from the United States.

We think this is a great opportunity to do two things:

  1. Discuss some of the key findings from the new study and place them in context.
  2. Spread the word to BRCA Negative women and families who: (1) may not have had a comprehensive look for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations at the time they were tested because either sequencing only or sequencing plus the 5-site large rearrangement panel only was done AND (2) may still be looking for explanations for a significant family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer.

Although standard clinical sequencing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (as implimented in Myriad Genetics’ BRACAnalysis test) does a good job of detecting single base changes and small insertion and deletion mutations (which are like spelling mistakes in the DNA code), it does not do a good job of detecting large rearrangements, deletions, and duplications (which are like additions or subtraction of one or more key paragraphs in the DNA code).  As these large rearrangements can confer the same remarkably elevated lifetime risks of breast and ovarian cancer that the smaller deleterious mutations can, alternative tests such as the “BART” test must be added to standard BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequencing in order to have a good comprehensive look for these larger rearrangements.

Some Key Features of Myriad Genetics’ Experience with Large Rearrangement Testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2

In the new paper, Thaddeus Judkins, Dr. Benjamin Roa, and their colleagues describe their experience with identification of large rearrangements in individuals tested at Myriad Genetics for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations between July 2007 and April 2011.

They report results for two distinct groups of patients which they refer to as “high-risk” and “elective”.

The high-risk group had the following characteristics:

  • Ordered test was “Comprehensive BRACAnalysis”
  • Met a set of clinical criteria suggesting that it was relatively likely that they had a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation
  • 25,535 individuals were in this group

In contrast, the elective group had these characteristics:

  • They did not meet the clinical criteria suggesting a relatively high likelihood of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation
  • Myriad Genetics’ BART test was ordered as an elective test to be run if there were no deleterious mutation detected by the combination of BRCA1/BRCA2 sequencing and the 5-site Large Rearrangement Panel (more details about the individual tests may be found in the previous post in this series)
  • Individuals were excluded if the BART test was cancelled (for a reason other than a positive result from sequencing or the large rearrangement panel – of note, this might include patients for whom payers refused preauthorization of payments for BART, etc.)
  • 22,921 individuals were in this group

How Frequent Were Large Rearrangements of BRCA1 and BRCA2?

Overall, in the high-risk group, about 23.8% of patients (~6,077 out of 25,535 tested) were found to have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation of any type.

  • 21.5% of the high-risk patients tested had a mutation detected via BRCA1/BRCA2 sequencing
  • 2.4% of the high-risk patients had a large rearrangement mutation detected with either the 5-site Large Rearrangement Panel or “BART” testing
  • Thus, in this group large rearrangements were just under 10% of the total number of mutations detected
  • For the high-risk group, about two-thirds of the identified mutations (including all types of mutations) were in BRCA1 and one-third in BRCA2

The “elective” group, had a lower mutation positive rate: about 8.2% of patients (~1,880 out of 22,921 tested).

  • 7.8% of the elective patients had a mutation detected via BRCA1/BRCA2 sequencing
  • 0.5% of the elective patients had a large rearrangement mutation detected
  • Therefore, in this group, large rearrangements were about 6% of the total number of mutations detected
  • For the elective group, about 45% of mutations overall were in BRCA1 and 55% were in BRCA2

A Diversity of Large Rearrangements Were Seen in This Study

Not surprisingly, given the large number of patients tested (48,456), many distinct large rearrangements were seen in the study:

  • 81 distinct large rearrangements in BRCA1
  • 27 distinct large rearrangements in BRCA2

Three types of large rearrangements were seen:

  • 84 deletions
  • 23 duplications
  • 1 triplication

The greater number of rearrangements in BRCA1 is consistent with the frequent occurence of a genomic structure called “Alu repeats” in and around the gene.  Areas of our genomes with these structures tend to be more susceptible to deletions, duplications and other rearrangements.

Additionally, the total number of distinct rearrangements is certainly even greater than these numbers, since the BART test will classify, for example, distinct duplications involving exons 13-15 of BRCA1 with distinct breakpoints in separate patients as the same duplication seen twice.  Thus, although the BART test is very useful for identifying large rearrangements conferring Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer risk, higher resolution techniques would be necessary for many of the rearrangements seen recurrently in this study in order to know whether it is truly the same rearrangement seen recurrently (versus distinct rearrangements that happen to involve generally the same area of the gene).

 Next Time: Large Rearrangements in Patients of Latin American and Caribbean Ancestry

It’s clear from both this report and from other data in the literature that certain large rearrangements can play a big role in patients with particular ancestry.  Large rearrangements play a particularly important role in patients of Latin American and/or Caribbean ancestry and we’ll cover this in the next post in this series.

Part 3 of this series on the important role that BRCA1/BRCA2 large rearrangements play – “Large Rearrangements Equal Big Impact in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Patients of Latin American and Caribbean Ancestry” will be available at CancerAndYourGenes on Wednesday, June 6, 2012.

Stay Tuned for the Other Posts in this Series on Mondays

Part 3 – “Large Rearrangements Equal Big Impact in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Patients of Latin American and Caribbean Ancestry” (Wednesday – June 6, 2012)

Part 4 – “Large Rearrangements in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Patients with African Ancestry” (Friday – June 8, 2012)

Part 5 – “What Patients Need to Know About BRCA1 and BRCA2 Large Rearrangement Testing” (Monday – June 11, 2012)

Part 6 – “Large Rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 – What Physicians and Genetic Counselors Need to Know” (Monday – June 18, 2012)

Part 7 – “Towards a Future in Which Testing for All BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations is Both Integrated and Routine” (Monday – June 25, 2012)

Do You Have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation?

If you have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, you may find our website BRCAscoop.com to be an extremely useful source of independent, non-industry-influenced, high-quality Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer information and education.

Are You BRCA Negative and Wondering Whether There May be Another Gene Behind Your Family History of Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer?

Check out The BRCA Negative Book project for answers and an opportunity to get involved!

 

Selected References

Judkins T, Rosenthal E, Arnell C et al.  Clinical significance of large rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2.  Cancer 2012 (published online ahead of print Apr 27 2012)

 

Note

Myriad and BRACAnalysis are trademarks of Myriad Genetics, Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.  Myriad Genetics, Inc. funded the work by Judkins et al. published in Cancer which we are independently discussing.

The Important Role of Rearrangements, Duplications, and Deletions of BRCA1 and BRCA2

(this is the 1st part of a 7 part series)

The Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer risk genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, are the most important genetic risk factors known for breast and ovarian cancer.  Individuals with a disease-associated mutation in one of these genes have markedly elevated breast cancer and ovarian cancer risks.  The identification of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation in a family means that relatives have a tool (being tested for the same mutation) that can help clarify whether they have similarly elevated risks of breast/ovarian cancer or, alternatively, risks that are closer to the general population.  Individuals with identified mutations can be screened for breast cancer more aggressively (with breast MRI for example) and can consider breast and ovarian cancer risk reduction approaches (risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for example).

Types of Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2

Several types of mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes can cause Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer risk.  Most are small:

Single Base Changes in the DNA Sequence

This category includes mutations that interfere with the production or function of a normal BRCA1 or BRCA2 protein in one of several different ways.

Small Insertions or Deletions

These mutations also lead to Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer risk because they interfere with the production or function of a normal BRCA1 or BRCA2 protein.

Both single base changes and small insertions or deletions can be identified by routine clinical BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing – which is most often done with a technique called Sanger sequencing.  However, there is a distinct category of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations – large rearrangements (duplications, deletions, etc.) – which are often not identifiable by routine DNA sequencing (particularly with Sanger sequencing which is most often used in clinical laboratories).

These large rearrangements are significantly bigger than the small insertions or deletions of a few DNA bases discussed above.  Instead, they involve the duplication, deletion, or other rearrangement of much bigger pieces of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes (entire exons or even the entire genes).

It’s not absolutely necessary for you to understand the science behind why certain mutations are detectable only with certain clinical laboratory techniques.  The important point that you need to know is that routine clinical sequencing (with Sanger sequencing methods) does not detect large genomic rearrangements, and that these can cause disease risk in the case of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (and just about every other genetic condition).

Importance of Large Rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2

In the United States, clinical testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations has been performed only at Myriad Genetics due to their intellectual property position.  Initially, BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing involved sequencing the genes only.  Thus, it was useful for detecting deleterious single base changes and small insertions or deletions that could cause Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer risk.  However, for technical reasons, which I won’t go into here, Sanger sequencing is unable to detect many large rearrangements, deletions and duplications.

Initially, it was not entirely clear what fraction of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were undetectable via the initial test; however, reports of large genomic rearrangements undetectable by the test began to trickle out.  As most BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing was initially performed in individuals and families of European descent, the large rearrangements that were initially described were primarily found in individuals of European descent.  A number of reports of the importance of these in families with normal BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequencing results (see reference list below) ultimately led Myriad Genetics to begin offering – as an adjunct to their BRACAnalysis BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequencing test – a test to detect five of the most common large rearrangements seen in BRCA1 in European populations (Myriad calls this test the 5-site Large Rearrangement Panel).

Although this was a useful addition to their testing menu, research groups around the world began to incorporate a wide variety of techniques that could screen for large rearrangements anywhere in the two genes.  This led the Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer community to appreciate several things:

1. Although the 5 rearrangements in the Myriad’s Large Rearrangement Panel test were not uncommon in individuals of European descent, when research groups comprehensively screened for large rearrangements in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer families with normal BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequencing, many more rearrangements involving numerous areas of both genes were found.

2. It became increasingly clear that particular rearrangements were more common in certain racial/ethnic backgrounds.

3. The lack of a clinically available more comprehensive test for large rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 led to a situation in which large rearrangements in individuals of non-European backgrounds could not be tested for.

Subsequently, Myriad Genetics made available another test, called “BART” (BRACAnalysis Rearrangement Test), which could more comprehensively look for large rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

In the U.S., depending on an individual’s personal and family history of cancer, the BART test is automatically performed in conjunction with sequencing for high-risk cases and is sometimes performed (on an elective basis) for lower risk cases if sequencing does not reveal a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Myriad Genetics has Published a New Overview of Their Clinical Testing Experience with Large Rearrangements of BRCA1 and BRCA2

Although Myriad Genetics has been testing a very large number of patients for large rearrangements over the last decade, there has been – to date – a limited window into the overall results of this testing.  A new paper, published in the journal Cancer, provides an update on their experience with large rearrangement testing for patients tested between July 2007 and April 2011.  The paper describes a massive amount of experience with large rearrangement testing, so we’ve decided to devote a series of posts to assessing the implications of this new paper for individuals and families who may be at risk for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and the physicians and genetic counselors who care for them.  We’ll post Part 2 soon We’ve posted Part 2 of the series and will have additional posts in this series over the next five weeks.

Click here for “The Important Role of Rearrangements, Duplications, and Deletions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 – Part 2″

Stay Tuned for the Other Posts in this Series

Part 3 – “Large Rearrangements Equal Big Impact in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Patients of Latin American and Caribbean Ancestry” (Wednesday – June 6, 2012)

Part 4 – “Large Rearrangements in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Patients with African Ancestry” (Friday – June 8, 2012)

Part 5 – “What Patients Need to Know About BRCA1 and BRCA2 Large Rearrangement Testing” (Monday – June 11, 2012)

Part 6 – “Large Rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 – What Physicians and Genetic Counselors Need to Know” (Monday – June 18, 2012)

Part 7 – “Towards a Future in Which Testing for All BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations is Both Integrated and Routine” (Monday – June 25, 2012)

 

Do You Have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation?

If you have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, you may find our website BRCAscoop.com to be an extremely useful source of independent, non-industry-influenced, high-quality Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer information and education.

 

Selected References

Judkins T, Rosenthal E, Arnell C et al.  Clinical significance of large rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2Cancer 2012 (published online before print Apr 27 2012)

Hendrickson BC, Judkins T, Ward BD et al.  Prevalence of five previously reported and recurrent BRCA1 genetic rearrangement mutations in 20,000 patients from hereditary breast/ovarian cancer familiesGenes Chromosomes Cancer 2005; 43:309-13.

Hogervorst FB, Nederlof PM, Gille JJ et al.  Large genomic deletions and duplications in the BRCA1 gene identified by a novel quantitative methodCancer Research 2003; 63:1449-53.

Nordling M, Karlsson P, Wahlström J et al.  A large deletion disrupts the exon 3 transcription activation domain of the BRCA2 gene in a breast/ovarian cancer familyCancer Research 1998; 58:1372-5.

Petrij-Bosch A, Peelen T, van Vliet M et al.  BRCA1 genomic deletions are major founder mutations in Dutch breast cancer patientsNature Genetics 1997; 17:341-5.

Puget N, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Sinilnikova OM et al.  Screening for germ-line rearrangements and regulatory mutations in BRCA1 led to the identification of four new deletionsCancer Research 1999; 59:455-61.

Puget N, Torchard D, Serova-Sinilnikova OM et al.  A 1-kb Alu-mediated germ-line deletion removing BRCA1 exon 17Cancer Research 1997; 57:828-31.

The BRCA1 Exon 13 Duplication Screening Group.  The exon 13 duplication in the BRCA1 gene is a founder mutation present in geographically diverse populationsAmerican Journal of Human Genetics 2000; 67:207-12.

Unger MA, Nathanson KL, Calzone K et al.  Screening for genomic rearrangements in families with breast and ovarian cancer identifies BRCA1 mutations previously missed by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis or sequencingAmerican Journal of Human Genetics 2000; 67:841-50.

Note

Myriad and BRACAnalysis are trademarks of Myriad Genetics, Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.  Myriad Genetics, Inc. funded the work by Judkins et al. published in Cancer which we are independently discussing.

ATM and Pancreatic Cancer Risk

Inherited pancreatic cancer risk is a very challenging problem.  Pancreatic cancer strikes fear into many who have seen a relative diagnosed with the disease - which is unfortunately often relentlessly progressive and extremely challenging to … [Continue reading]

Hereditary Mixed Polyposis Syndrome: A New Genetic Explanation Involving the GREM1 Gene

If you or someone you know may have Hereditary Mixed Polyposis Syndrome, there is some interesting news from the research world that is worth knowing about. What is Hereditary Mixed Polyposis Syndrome? Hereditary Mixed Polyposis Syndrome (HMPS) is … [Continue reading]

A New Look for Cancer and Your Genes

CAYG-400px

If you're a returning visitor, you've almost certainly noticed a few changes around the site. We've gone from this... ...to this.   Our goals in switching things up were several-fold: 1. CancerAndYourGenes was long overdue … [Continue reading]

More on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and BRCA1 Mutations: This Time from Greece

Recently, we discussed a study from a group in the United Kingdom that - among other things - clearly demonstrated that women diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer before age 50 (and unselected for family history) had a substantial risk of … [Continue reading]

Abraxas: A New Hereditary Breast Cancer Gene

If you have a compelling family history of breast cancer that is not explained by a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation, another gene - Abraxas - has been added to the list of possible explanations. An international team, led by Drs. Robert Winqvist of … [Continue reading]

New Evidence Supports BRCA1 Testing for All Women with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Diagnosed Before Age 50

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) - which when examined by a pathologist lacks expression of the estrogen receptor, the progesterone receptor, and HER2 - accounts for a little more than 1 out of every 7 breast cancer cases.  Not … [Continue reading]

Mutations in the DIS3L2 Gene Cause Perlman Syndrome: Another Key Clue in Unraveling the Puzzle of Wilms Tumor Development

Wilms tumor (also referred to as nephroblastoma) is a relatively uncommon pediatric cancer (about 1 out of every 9,000 children are affected) - although it is the most common of the childhood cancers involving the kidney. Sometimes, Wilms tumor … [Continue reading]

Other Cancers Seen in Families with RAD51D Mutations

Two days ago, we discussed a recent study by Dr. Nazneen Rahman and colleagues which clearly demonstrated that inherited mutations in a gene called RAD51D result in a substantial elevation in risk for ovarian cancer.  Some families with mutations in … [Continue reading]